Can You Say: UTB/TSC? said...
Truth be told, UTB/TSC is only marginally "an institution of higher education." Much of that condition arises from the abysmal lack of preparation of the students coming to the school from the surrounding public schools. Beat your chest and tear your hair all you want, you misguided apologists for the hideous state of public education, it's not going to change that fact.
Any weight UTB/TSC carries in the world of education comes from its accreditation. Without that, it irrefutably becomes what many already see it as: Juliet Garcia's combination money factory and playground for border retards.
The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) is the organization that provides the accreditation to UTB/TSC. They accomplish this by periodically coming to each institution and looking very closely at what the institution claims its mission is, what the institution is actually doing as relates to accomplishing that proclaimed mission, what sorts of results the various schools and colleges are getting, and the levels of academic progress students are making.
They are very serious, and they don't play at it. And they're coming to you-know-where in the very near future.
Most institutions have what is generally known as an office of institutional effectiveness, or something very similar. This is the office charged with making sure that when the accrediting body comes to check stuff out, it all looks good. Most institutions have had such an office in place for years, if not decades. The office at UTB/TSC was only created in the last couple of years. And this was somewhat of a panic response to the realization that SACS was coming and they weren't really looking like a good candidate for continued accreditation. Or at the very least, not without sanctions, a probationary period or some other very obvious process that the entire rest of the educational world could not help but see as proof of failure and incompetence.
One way to make the horrendous numbers that accompany hundreds of students requiring more than the state or national average number of hours of remediation in order to even qualify to attempt college level work; degrees taking six, eight or more years to complete by students barely able to maintain a 2.0 Grade Point Average (GPA); students typically losing access to federal student aid due to failure to maintain academic standards mandated by that program; students completing enough hours to account for at least a bachelor’s degree, but their completed courses to not conform to any approved course of study for which a degree can be awarded – one way to get the low graduation numbers to look better, is to get all those struggling students out of the system.
It appears that it was decided that a Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) evaluation would be made as a means for culling some of the more embarrassing members of the student body. Finally, we’re getting close to addressing the Dual Enrollment students.
A Freedom of Information Act request will yield nothing. The institution, regardless of the fact that it disburses state and federal monies, is not a governmental body and is not required to comply. Even if it were, you can be sure that there is no appreciable paper trail in existence regarding this activity. All students, including high school students who are being duped into duel enrollment by the office of Enrollment Planning in order to artificially bolster sagging enrollment numbers, are subject to SAP standards.
(One of the university’s, and the Office of Enrollment Planning’s, paramount objectives has been to meet or exceed expected national averages for enrollment increases. This is essential in demonstrating that a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) in one of the poorest regions of the nation is being managed so remarkably by a Hispanic woman, Juliet Garcia, that it is able to show such advancement, which is undoubtedly being followed with the well known benefits that accrue to the surrounding area through the increased educational level of the population.)
The additional hidden problem here is that many of these dual enrollment students are C- and D-average public school students, not those students for whom the rather demanding dual enrollment program was designed. As a result, many of the little Pedro’s y Bonita’s don’t make the grade; they might come for a few classes but their English isn’t good enough and they’d rather be “hangin with their homies” so they just quit coming. Next thing you know, little Bonita is looking to get into TSC so she can get a respiratory therapist’s certificate, but she’s already on SAP probation because she doesn’t have a 70% completion rate and a 2.0 GPA because of her long forgotten episode with dual enrollment. Another 18 year old in skin-tight mid-calf length hip-hugging designer jeans, $65 dollar blouse revealing no more cleavage than would be appropriate for an 11 pm appearance at the favorite club, set off with pink patent leather Hello Kitty seven inch stiletto heels and coin purse-sized hand bag has her dreams of future financial success stomped hard in the middle of the back by the big muddy black boot of reality.
There is a LOT of ugly crap going down there, on the border by the sea, and it’s not all coming from across the border. To all appearances, Dr. Garcia has taken what could have been a beacon of hope, painted it up as a one-size-fits-all solution for the region’s ignorance and poverty, bought red rubber noses for all parties, and transformed it into her own private legacy building empire.
Post script:
The catch 22 to all this, and you knew with this level plotting and intrigue there would be at least one, is that if they ditch the students that make their numbers look bad for SACS, then their claimed amazing enrollment accomplishment disappears.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!”
~ Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, canto vi, stanza 17.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Comment Worthy of Distinction
Posted by
The Merovingian
at
12:16 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

12 comments:
And that's probably why not everything transfers to a real university.
As a proud 2006 alum of the University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College, I take exception, and am frankly insulted, with the preceding post's assertions. Many of them are unfounded, untrue, and unfortunately, this blog's owner thought it was “worthy of distinction” to drag it out of the comments section and place it on its front page.
This anonymous post starts off with the following claim: “Most institutions have what is generally known as an office of institutional effectiveness, or something very similar. This is the office charged with making sure that when the accrediting body comes to check stuff out, it all looks good. Most institutions have had such an office in place for years, if not decades. The office at UTB/TSC was only created in the last couple of years. And this was somewhat of a panic response to the realization that SACS was coming and they weren't really looking like a good candidate for continued accreditation.”
If this anonymous author did any elementary digging on UTB-TSC's Web site, s/he would find the following page (http://blue.utb.edu/irp/Evaluation&Measures%20Data/Evaluation%20Measures%20Main%20Page.htm), which illustrates UTB-TSC's response to and since its last SACS accreditation in 1997. The institution has measured/evaluated its institutional performance for a decade. In fact, some of its research dates back to the late 1980s.
The nameless author of this post goes on to write: “...one way to get the low graduation numbers to look better, is to get all those struggling students out of the system. It appears that it was decided that a Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) evaluation would be made as a means for culling some of the more embarrassing members of the student body.”
The SAP is likely the groundwork for many more similar institutional policies that places focus on student academic success and achievement. As a university grows, so will its students. It's difficult to tell whether the author is praising or mocking this program, but it's clear that it deserves more of the former instead of the latter.
The following claim by this anonymous author is probably the most outlandish: “Freedom of Information Act request will yield nothing. The institution, regardless of the fact that it disburses state and federal monies, is not a governmental body and is not required to comply. Even if it were, you can be sure that there is no appreciable paper trail in existence regarding this activity.”
For the most part, the University and its attorney are usually not shy about releasing any information of interest to the public. In fact, the procedure to go about requesting information is posted on the school's business affairs Web site. The Collegian is also a great source for information, especially of the kind that's student-related.
On the issue of dual enrollment, I see a claim without much meat behind it: The additional hidden problem here is that many of these dual enrollment students are C- and D-average public school students, not those students for whom the rather demanding dual enrollment program was designed.
Anyone who read that statement should put it into question. Again, this nameless critic says something without any factual proof. Just on its face, however, it seems highly unlikely that high schools taking college course credit are C-and-D average public school students.
The anonymous opiner attempts to close with a nonfactual shot at Dr. Garcia: “To all appearances, Dr. Garcia has taken what could have been a beacon of hope, painted it up as a one-size-fits-all solution for the region’s ignorance and poverty, bought red rubber noses for all parties, and transformed it into her own private legacy building empire.”
The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College is one of a few glimmers of hope in deep South Texas. It serves as a bastion for the free-exchange of ideas, liberal (lower-case 'L') educations, and award-winning and nationally-recognized academic, civic, and extra-curricular programs and initiatives. Is it perfect? Not by a long shot. But for the cynics, however, the path to criticism is always the easier one to take — not for a lack of the path to solutions and answers — rather their refusal to see it.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!”
~ Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, canto vi, stanza 17.
Amen.
- Josh Caldwell
UTB-TSC Class of 2006
Alpha Chi, Phi Theta Kappa
(NOTE: Sorry for the previous comment deletions. I had HTML coding issues.)
BEWARE!!!!!
El CD (Chris Davis) is ousting anyone that might log to his blog as anon.
CHINwawa (CHINgao)
Anonymous" using PZ's e-mail address (by default) and posting from PZ's IP said:
to CD-que gacho el cucaracho
Yea, you only get away with that once.
Josh,
The comment that you have taken such exception to, “[a]s a proud 2006 alum of the University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College,” originally appeared under the heading An Eyewitness Says for the simple fact that it was made by an eyewitness.
This is not going to become a debate concerning the validity of any of the observations I made because, frankly, you don’t know and I do. The fact that you are offended changes nothing. I am compelled to comment anonymously because the information I present is embarrassing, even potentially damaging, and we live in a world where repercussions are a very real danger.
For what it’s worth, the Eyewitness has degrees from UTB/TSC, magna cum laude, President’s List, Dean’s List (multiple times each), Alpha Chi, Phi Theta Kappa, recipient of the Scholastic Excellence Award, multi-year recipient of STARS, as well as other scholarships awarded for academic excellence.
I have one I was an eyewitness to.
One of the online pages regarding degree plans and courses of studies listed many required courses that had pre-requisites that were not required courses for the degree plan. This, as many know, is in direct violation of accreditation standards. This was pointed out in a web posting on the site.
The university’s solution:
Address it?
Change it?
No. Their solution was to take that web page offline.
(In my best Captain Lesard from Police Academy)
I have many, many stories that I could tell.
“Of course I know. It is my business to know.” -The Merovingian
Anonymous:
The fact that you are offended changes nothing.
Any like-minded individual, should be offended by such statements made without any factual backing. If they were eyewitness accounts, give names, give more detail.
Don't try to rip up an argument based on facts contrary to what was said because you don't like it. I pointed out three holes in your "eyewitness" accounts, and if I'm wrong, prove it, and I'll concede. Until you do, however, your flowery writing, while entertaining, is null and void.
the information I present is embarrassing, even potentially damaging, and we live in a world where repercussions are a very real danger.
(That's really good. Do you write for Fox News?)
The reason why some blogs don't receive the journalistic credibility they deserve is because of anonymous comments like this one. Bloggers like Melissa Zamora, Chris Davis, and BWC put their name behind every posting they make, and allow their readers to praise them or even take them to task.
Re: Mero's Eyewitness Account
What did you do, about what you saw?
-Josh Caldwell
Reported it to the Provost of Students, of course. It seemed that the student's advocate on campus was the logical place to go.
M.
Provost of Students? Are you talking about UTB?
I think you mean the Dean of Students, if you really did report it.
if you really did report it.
So, which UTB dept. feathers your nest?
The office title is, just plain Provost. Every university has one. The job is supposed to be student's advocate. The actual "job" as done locally has nothing to do with that whatsoever. It is just another buffer layer between Dr. Juliette Garcia and accountability.
Just find out how many student complaints were handled effectively by that office. If the complaint has legitimacy, the offer "Well, you can discuss it with Dr. Garcia." is offered. Dr. Garcia then decided if the argument has merit. Some advocacy!
I guess the Provosts office is now an item for discussion.
Now, aren't you glad you opened that can of worms?
"Of course I know. It is my business to know." -The Merovingian
"There is a LOT of ugly crap going down there, on the border by the sea, and it’s not all coming from across the border"
This applies to BISD classrooms too.
Post a Comment